Microsoft Advertising · Bing · Copilot · Audience Network

Bing Ads management, built for Microsoft’s auction.

Microsoft Advertising management for US businesses — campaigns rebuilt for Microsoft's auction rather than copied across from Google, with LinkedIn company, industry and job function targeting that no other search platform offers.

  • LinkedIn profile targeting — company, industry and job function
  • UET tag installed and verified, not left behind on import
  • Usually cheaper clicks than the same keywords on Google
  • Managed alongside Google, measured for incremental value

Start with a free audit

See whether Microsoft is worth adding. Two minutes to request.

No spam. No sales sequence. One reply from a real person.

Request received

Check your inbox for a confirmation from info@adzlance.com.

The unfair advantage

Search targeting by company, industry and job function

Microsoft owns LinkedIn. That means its ad platform can layer LinkedIn profile data on top of search intent — targeting available on no other search engine.

01

Company targeting

Bid more when someone from a named company searches your terms. For account-based marketing, this is search advertising that finally aligns with a target account list.

02

Job function targeting

Separate the finance director researching your software from the student writing a dissertation about it — same query, very different value.

03

Industry targeting

Where your product suits some verticals far better than others, bid accordingly rather than paying the same for every click on a generic term.

For a B2B advertiser this is frequently the single best argument for running Microsoft at all. Google can infer intent from a query but cannot tell you the searcher works in procurement at a 5,000-person manufacturer.

Straight assessment

Is Microsoft Advertising worth running?

It is a supplement to Google, never a replacement. Search volume is a fraction of Google's — that part is not in dispute. The question is whether the traffic that does exist is worth having.

IN FAVOUR

Cheaper clicks, less competition

  • Fewer advertisers bidding means lower cost per click in most categories
  • Impression share is easier to hold at the top of the page
  • Budgets that are capped out on Google can often find profitable room here
IN FAVOUR

The audience skews commercial

  • Bing is the default in Edge and on managed Windows machines — which means offices
  • Desktop-heavy usage, which correlates with research and considered purchases
  • Reach extends beyond Bing to Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, AOL and Ecosia
  • Copilot placements add a growing AI-assistant surface
AGAINST

When it is not worth it

  • Very small total budgets, where splitting attention costs more than the incremental volume returns
  • Categories aimed at younger, mobile-first consumers
  • Accounts where Google itself is not yet properly structured or tracked — fix that first

The most common mistake

Importing from Google and calling it done

Microsoft's Google Ads import is genuinely useful and genuinely dangerous. It gets you live in an afternoon and quietly wrong for months.

Bids arrive at Google levels

Imported bids reflect Google's auction, which is more competitive. Left untouched, you overpay from day one for clicks that were available far cheaper.

Conversion tracking does not come across

Microsoft uses its own UET tag. An imported campaign with no UET tag installed is optimising against nothing, and reporting nothing back.

Match types behave differently

Close-variant handling and negative keyword behaviour are not identical to Google's. Search terms diverge, and the negative lists you imported do not cover them.

Audience targeting goes unused

LinkedIn profile targeting has no Google equivalent, so an import never includes it. The main reason to be on the platform sits switched off.

Sync overwrites local optimisation

Scheduled imports can undo Microsoft-specific work on every sync, quietly resetting weeks of adjustment back to Google's settings.

Shopping feeds need their own setup

Microsoft Merchant Center is separate from Google's, with its own requirements and its own disapprovals to clear.

The work

What gets managed on a Microsoft account

SETUP

Built properly, not imported blindly

  • Structure imported as a starting point, then rebid for Microsoft's auction
  • UET tag installed and conversion goals verified before spend scales
  • Scheduled sync configured so it cannot overwrite local work
  • Microsoft Merchant Center set up separately for Shopping campaigns
ONGOING

Platform-specific optimisation

  • Search terms mined against Microsoft's own data, not Google's
  • LinkedIn profile targeting layered on and bid-adjusted by segment
  • Microsoft Audience Network managed — and excluded where it wastes budget
  • Device bid adjustments reflecting the desktop skew
REPORTING

Measured against Google, not in isolation

  • Incremental volume assessed — new demand, or the same buyers found twice
  • Blended cost per acquisition across both search platforms
  • Budget moved between the two based on marginal return, not fixed splits

Cost

What management costs

Fee

Flat monthly fee

Based on complexity, not a percentage of spend. For most accounts Microsoft is added to an existing Google engagement rather than managed alone, which usually makes it the cheapest channel to add.

Ads

Your ad spend

Typically lower cost per click than the same keywords on Google, with lower volume. The honest framing: smaller pond, cheaper fishing.

Term

Month to month

No lock-in. You keep ownership of the Microsoft Advertising account, the UET tag and all campaign history.

Questions

Microsoft Advertising questions

Are Bing Ads and Microsoft Advertising the same thing?
Yes. The platform was renamed Microsoft Advertising in 2019, but most people still search for Bing Ads and both names refer to the same system. Ads run across Bing, Copilot, Microsoft Start and the Microsoft Audience Network, and syndicated partners including Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, AOL and Ecosia.
Is Bing advertising worth it compared to Google?
As a supplement, often yes. Search volume is a fraction of Google's, so it will not replace it. But cost per click is typically lower because fewer advertisers compete, the audience skews toward desktop and office environments where Bing is the default, and LinkedIn profile targeting is available. For B2B and for accounts already capped out on Google, it frequently returns well. For small budgets or younger mobile-first audiences, often not.
What is LinkedIn profile targeting?
Microsoft owns LinkedIn, so its ad platform can layer LinkedIn profile data over search intent — targeting or bid-adjusting by company, industry and job function. No other search engine offers this. For account-based marketing it means search advertising can finally be aligned to a target account list rather than inferred from keywords alone.
Can I just import my Google Ads campaigns?
You can, and it is a reasonable starting point, but importing and leaving it is the most common mistake on this platform. Imported bids reflect Google's more competitive auction, conversion tracking does not transfer because Microsoft uses its own UET tag, match type behaviour differs, and LinkedIn targeting is never included in an import. Scheduled syncs can also overwrite Microsoft-specific optimisation on every run.
What is the UET tag?
Universal Event Tracking is Microsoft's equivalent of the Google Ads tag. It records conversions and powers remarketing audiences. It does not come across in a Google import, so an imported account with no UET tag installed is optimising against no conversion data at all. Installing and verifying it is the first technical step in any setup here.
How much does Bing Ads management cost?
A flat monthly fee based on account complexity rather than a percentage of ad spend. In practice Microsoft is usually added to an existing Google engagement rather than managed alone, which makes it the least expensive channel to add. The fee is quoted after a free audit.
Do you manage Google and Microsoft together?
Yes, and that is the arrangement that works best. Managing the two search platforms separately makes it impossible to tell whether Microsoft is generating incremental demand or reaching the same buyers twice. Run together, budget can be moved between them based on marginal return rather than a fixed split.
Get My Free Audit →